• About
    • Mission
    • Vision (Preservation Rights)
    • Value (Overcoming Objections)
    • FAQ
  • People
    • Advisors
    • Competitors
    • Judges
    • Fellows
    • Staff
    • Volunteers
    • Donors
  • Blog
  • Aspirational Neuroscience Prize
  • Brain Preservation Prize
    • Prize Overview
    • 21CM Cryo for Viability
    • 21CM Aldehyde-Stabilized Cryo
    • Mikula Mouse Brain Chemo
  • Media
    • Videos
    • BPF in the News
    • Essays / Papers / Links
  • How You Can Help
  • About
    • Mission
    • Vision (Preservation Rights)
    • Value (Overcoming Objections)
    • FAQ
  • People
    • Advisors
    • Competitors
    • Judges
    • Fellows
    • Staff
    • Volunteers
    • Donors
  • Blog
  • Aspirational Neuroscience Prize
  • Brain Preservation Prize
    • Prize Overview
    • 21CM Cryo for Viability
    • 21CM Aldehyde-Stabilized Cryo
    • Mikula Mouse Brain Chemo
  • Media
    • Videos
    • BPF in the News
    • Essays / Papers / Links
  • How You Can Help

Archives

Monthly Archive for: "September, 2015"
Home /
 Ken Hayworth’s personal response to MIT Technology Review article
 13
16
By Ken Hayworth
In Brain Preservation, Cryopreservation
Posted September 16, 2015

Ken Hayworth’s personal response to MIT Technology Review article

READ MORE
 A Courageous Story of Brain Preservation, “Dying Young” by Amy Harmon, the New York Times.
 0
5
By Andy McKenzie
In Brain Preservation, Cryopreservation, Cryonics, Chemopreservation
Posted September 13, 2015

A Courageous Story of Brain Preservation, “Dying Young” by Amy Harmon, the New York Times.

READ MORE
 BPF’s 2015 Attitudes About Brain Preservation Survey
 0
5
By Andy McKenzie
In Survey
Posted September 2, 2015

BPF’s 2015 Attitudes About Brain Preservation Survey

READ MORE
Contact BPF Staff

For competition information:
kenneth.hayworth@gmail.com
For technical enquiries:
kenneth.hayworth@gmail.com
For gift-giving enquiries:
johnsmart@gmail.com
For media enquiries:
oge@nnadi.org

Popular Posts
  • Ken Hayworth’s personal response to MIT Technology Review article
    Ken Hayworth’s personal response to MIT Technology Review article
    September 16, 2015
  • I’m a 19-year-old Terminal Patient. Medical Brain Preservation Should not be Difficult to Discuss or Adopt
    I’m a 19-year-old Terminal Patient. Medical Brain Preservation Should not be Difficult to Discuss or Adopt
    February 16, 2021
  • Do We Need a Noncryogenic Brain Preservation Prize?
    Do We Need a Noncryogenic Brain Preservation Prize?
    October 1, 2020
  • Scott Aaronson On The Relevance Of Quantum Mechanics To Brain Preservation, Uploading, And Identity.
    Scott Aaronson On The Relevance Of Quantum Mechanics To Brain Preservation, Uploading, And Identity.
    March 1, 2016
Disclaimer

The BPF does not currently support the offering of ASC, or any other preservation method, to human patients. The BPF has released a document outlining its position on what should be expected prior to any such offering. Quoting from that document: “The entire ASC-for-human-application procedure and associated quality control protocol should be tested in suitable laboratory animals and/or in human anatomical donations prior to any medical offering, and the results of these studies should be published so that they can be reviewed by the wider medical community before any medical offering is made.”

CC0
To the extent possible under law, the Brain Preservation Foundation waives all copyright and related rights to this Website.

Login

Start typing and press Enter to search

en_USEnglish
en_USEnglish zh_CN简体中文